It’s Been a Ride…

 

Well, the election is over. If you haven’t seen the results yet, results for the COUNTY are available here on the county elections page, for the whole state here on the Sec of State web-page. Winning (or losing) an election in the county doesn’t mean the candidate actually won (or lost), so the Secretary of State is the place to go.

Turnout was about 10% higher than 4 years ago at the same time (i.e. in the middle of the last presidential term). Republicans did very well for a midterm party that controls the presidency. But there’s no doubt we felt some pain.

 

Now It’s time to Elect New Leadership.

 

Every two years San Juan County Republican Party (SJCRP) elects new leadership to a two year term. Precinct Committee Officers elected by the public in the fall of the preceding year (in this case Fall 2018) have the right to vote.

DATE: Dec 1, 2018

LOCATION: China Pearl, Friday Harbor (upstairs)

TIME: 11:30 a.m.

WHO: Elected PCOs may vote, but all may attend. The new chairman can appoint PCOs to fill vacant slots thus filling out SJCRP’s leadership.

ANYONE may be elected to a leadership role, whether a PCO or not. If you are interested, show up!

Counties all across the state, Republicans and Democrats, are doing the same thing over the next two months.

 

Elected PCOs for SJC Republican Party:

 

101 Friday Harbor North:  Heather Christensen
102 Fridary Harbor South:  Tom Starr
12 San Juan South West:  Minnie Knych
13 San Juan Central: Michelle Loftus
14 San Juan West:  Maury Liebman
15 San Juan North:  Sidney Smith
16 San Juan East: William Hancock
24 Eastsound:  Rick Bouche
31 Lopez North:  Lynda Gerpheide

These people have the right to vote for officers, having been elected as delegates by their precincts. If you have an opinion to pass along to your PCO, contact them here.

Not all precincts have a PCO. Vacant slots can be filled by the new Chairman, to be elected on Dec 1st.

It’s time to Vote, Election Day is Nov 6th.

 

If you are registered to vote, you should have received your ballot by 10/25 (Thursday). If you did not receive it please contact the San Juan County Elections Office. Phone: 360-378-3357. Talk to Carlys or Camolyn.

Voter’s Guide (PDF)

Voter’s Guide (online version)

Sample Ballot

Looking for rules about political signs? Try MRSC “Regulating Non-Commercial Temporary Signs During Election Season”

Contact your PCO or a party leader if you have questions: http://sjcrp.org/about/your-pcos/ 

 

Election Observers Needed

November 1, November 6, at 9 a.m.  and November 7 at 11 a.m.

email me: sjcrpchair@gmail.com

 

SJC Republican Party Endorsements

Candidates

US Senator: Susan Hutchison (prefers Republican)

40th Leg State House: Michael Petrish (prefers Republican)

Initiatives 

I 940: Police Training and Criminal Liability — vote NO

I 1631: Carbon Emissions Fee: — vote NO

I 1634:  Prohibit Local Taxes on Groceries measure  — vote YES

I 1639:  Changes to Gun Ownership and Purchase Requirements — vote NO

Proposition 1:  Affordable Housing Real Estate Excise Tax — vote NO

More information on Initiatives is available from the 10/3 newsletter found here. Sorry about the website formatting, the emails don’t convert very well — but the information is there.

 

Now for the harder races: Sheriff and Prosecuting Attorney…

 

The number one question party leadership gets asked is the sheriff and prosecuting attorney. The SJC Republican Party has endorsed none of the candidates. Anybody who tells you there is a clear conservative choice is just wrong.

There are many Republicans who feel strongly about each of the candidates. After the debate last Saturday those who were present discussed each of the races. This was one that generated a lot of airtime.

The Opioid crisis. The handling of a bad apple police investigator. Abby Finney’s wrongful death. Facebook time. Sheriff’s guild endorsements. Photoshopped candidate photo. Political signs. Police dogs. Lying to the council. If you have been following the local news you know how each of these issues have impacted BOTH contests. I’m not going to lay them all out.

Bad things happen in this world, some of them because of other people — that’s why we have a Sheriff and a Prosecuting Attorney. Here’s the biggest question: do you think each challenger (Nick Power and Jeff Asher) would have done a better job in dealing with each controversial issue?

If you do, then vote for change. If not, don’t.

You can read what some other conservatives are saying below.

 

… And Now for the Down Ballot Races

 

These are not official endorsements of the Republican Party. Few people have strong feelings about these candidates, but I asked some people to help me do research and here is what we got.

Judicial Court of Appeals Div. 1, District 3:  Tom Seguine  

Tom is the former chairman of the Skagit County Republican Party, but he is also very qualified.

• Over 28 years Practicing Attorney in northwest Washington.
• 17 years as Prosecutor in Skagit, San Juan, and Whatcom Counties.
• 10 years private practice, mixed litigation of civil and criminal cases.
• Litigated close to 50 appellate matters since 2007 in private practice.

Read more about Tom in the voter’s guide or on his website here.

District Court Judge:  Steve Brandli 

His opponent Carolyn Jewett is very young. She’s endorsed by the democrats. As one Republican said, “she still uses experiences from college to answer questions.” That said, she was relatively nice when I emailed with her, I’m not saying she’s a horrible person, just that she’s liberal and maybe too young for this job.

Steve Brandli is:

• 55 years old
• Graduated University of Washington School of Law, top 5% of class
• 12 years practicing law in San Juan County
• Former Deputy Prosecutor for San Juan County District Court
• 10 years in private practice handling civil and criminal cases
• 2 years as a public defender

Read about Steve in the voter’s guide or on his website here.

WA State Supreme Court Position 8 –

Honestly, Nathan Choi is going to get votes from Republicans because he is right wing and not funded by the left, but he does seem “out there” to me.

From HIS website: “It has recently been brought to Nathan Choi that he is being called a conspiracy theorist.  Nathan Choi stands by his position that the Titanic was intentionally sunk so that the “Creature from Jekell Island” would be enacted.  That creature being the Not so Federal Reserve.” https://www.nathanchoiforjudge.org/conspiracy-theorist/ 

Read about Nathan in the voter’s guide or on his website here.

On the other hand, his opponent is a current Supreme Court justice on one of the most wildly left-wing courts in the country. He is funded by the left.

Read about Steve in the voter’s guide or on his website here.

So, not great. This is why our state keeps having crazy court rulings.

 

Let’s Hear from Some Conservative Voices —

 

Cindy’s Picks

Long Answer:

US Rep:  Brian Luke – Not really endorsing the Libertarian, but way better than gone extremist Rick Larson.  Seems he no longer feels the need to appear to be a moderate.  Democrats are working on taking the House so they can impeach Trump.  They will do anything to get those proceedings started, even though President Trump has done an amazing job with international relationships, bringing jobs back to the US and strengthening our economy.  We need to keep the D’s from being in charge of the House!

Judicial Court of Appeals Div. 1, District 3:  Tom Seguine  Tom Seguine is not an activist judge…he will rule impartially as he has always done.  His opponent seems to be working to change the laws through judicial activism.  This is not the way our Constitution, both state and federal, is set up.  Vote for Tom Seguine to maintain our Constitution and the law of the land.

Prosecuting Attorney:  Nick Power?  Randy Gaylord’s office does not want to prosecute drug offenders, to the point where they would not even consider the case on Lopez until the Lopezians got involved and insisted.  Nick Power is a wild card….having done many things that have angered both conservative and liberal county citizens.  Would it be worth it to get rid of one for the other? We will never know unless we try, and we know what we will get if we don’t.  I recommend a vote for change!!!

Sheriff:  Ron Krebbs Ron has done an excellent job the past 4 years, gaining the respect of deputies and undersheriffs and county citizens alike.  There is some fuss in the newspapers about some disgruntled former employees and some emotional distress, but Ron is, as one citizen of the county put it, the best sheriff we have had in years!!!  So true.  Uzek Susal, well known for his straight up work on Orcas, verified in the Islands’ Sounder that 22 of the people who know the sheriff and work for him, endorse Ron Krebbs.  One endorsed his opponent…probably himself.  Vote for Ron Krebbs to keep a really great sheriff.

District Court Judge:  Steve Brandli  this is such an open and shut case it should not even be a contest.  If you look at their experience, Steve Brandli has all of the necessary experience that is needed to be a qualified judge.  His opponent is fresh out of college and currently employed by the very agency who will be coming to her for cases, the county Prosecuting Attorney’s office.  This is an easy pick, vote for Steve.

A Prayer for Christians to Vote

Courtesy of Sandra Frinell

“Dear Father, I do not take lightly what You have done for our nation. I appreciate not only the right but the privilege I have to vote. I pray that I, as well as others, will use that privilege wisely, seeking Your will as we consider the qualifications of those for whom we are to vote”

—Pray for Our Nation, by Keith and Megan Provance

From one of our Members.  Please consider taking the survey —

“We are asking you to participate in this survey. The survey asks about your views on youth substance use in the community. We will use this information to help us understand your thoughts and feelings, in order to better serve youth in our community.

This survey is anonymous. We will not know who you are or which responses are yours. Your responses will be kept confidential and will be reported only in the aggregate (combined with other responses).

This survey is voluntary. That means you can skip any question or stop the survey at any time. The survey will take about 15 minutes.”

English Version Here | Version en español aquí